Chaque semaine, David Kim, Senior Game Designer chez Blizzard et responsable de l'équilibrage sur Starcraft II : Legacy of the Void, fait le point sur le développement du jeu et s'exprime sur les prochaines évolutions à venir et sur les retours qu'elles avaient suscités dans la communauté.
Cette semaine, Blizzard parle du prochain map pool et discute des modifications à venir et/ou en réflexion pour Zerg et Terran :
- Un nouveau map pool sera mis en place d'ici la fin du mois de mars.
Quatre cartes seront supprimées : les trois plus anciennes (Ruines de Seras, Chantier naval orbital et Crête de Lerilak) ainsi que Protocole central, et remplacées par autant de nouvelles :
- Protocole central sera remplacé par une carte au concept similaire mais avec une meilleur exécution, Invader (4).
- La deuxième carte va permettre aux joueurs de détruire les tours rocheuses afin de bloquer tout passage vers votre base et trois expands. Blizzard veut essayer de créer des scénarios de type-île sans les problèmes des cartes à îles.
- La troisième carte contiendra une longue et petite rampe qui mènera de votre base au champ de bataille principal. Les joueurs pourront bloquer ce goulot d'étranglement (choke) avec des unités ou des bâtiments.
- La quatrième carte est (8)KorhalCarnageKnockout. Sur cette grande carte les joueurs auront énormément d'alternatives pour leurs stratégies défensives et offensives et devront réfléchir à deux fois avant de détruire les Tours rocheuses ou les rochers destructibles.
Blizzard aborde ensuite les multiples modifications à l'équilibrage actuellement en réflexion :
- Les points de vie du Cyclone seront augmentés ainsi que son coût en ravitaillement.
Blizzard pense que c'est le bon changement a apporter vu le prix assez coûteux de l'unité afin de la buff en début/milieu de partie sans changer son impact sur la fin de partie.
- Vers un nerf du Croiseur pour un buff de la Banshee ?
Blizzard envisage de compenser un éventuel nerf de la portée Air/Sol du Croiseur en supprimant le pré-requis de l'Armurerie pour l’amélioration de vitesse des Banshees.
- Apporter une meilleur solution anti-air dans l'Usine.
Blizzard réfléchit quand à permettre aux Terrans d'avoir une meilleur défense anti-air parmi ses unités produites dans l'Usine. Le Cyclone est l'un des candidats potentiels si l'idée précédente n'est pas retenue. Le Thor aussi pourrait recevoir un buff de ses dégâts anti-air. Mais comme la Mine veuve permet déjà d'avoir de bons dégâts de zone contre les unités aériennes, le Thor recevrait dans ce cas là un buff de ses dégâts anti-air mono-cible.
- Sur l'augmentation du temps de recharge de la bile corrosive du Saccageur de 10 à 14 secondes.
Blizzard veut absolument nerf les timings Saccageurs ou des drops zergs en PvZ mais pense qu'un double nerf simultané serait de trop.
- Le drop des Dominants nécessitera la technologie Terrier (T2)
Blizzard pense que ce serait un gros nerf pour Zerg mais aussi le changement le plus raisonnable. Blizzard n'a pas encore décidé quel nerf sera mis à l'essai le premier entre le Saccageur et le Drop.
Enfin, en raison de la présence de plusieurs ses membres à la Game Developers Conference, Blizzard confirme qu'il n'y aura pas de mise à jour la semaine prochaine.
Blizzard sur Community Feedback Update - March 11 (Source)
Map Updates
We saw good discussion around maps this week, and wanted to remind you that new maps will be coming in towards the end of this month.
Map diversity is our main goal for 1v1 maps, and we're on the lookout for potential balance issues that may come up as we pursue that goal. This doesn't mean that we should just jump at any new strategy that initially looks overpowered—new strategies almost always looks overpowered at first and oftentimes turn out fine once players learn to deal with it. Instead, we should be doing our best to figure out new strategies and counters to those new strategies, but if there are real balance issues we need to work hard towards addressing them as soon as possible.
The 1v1 map cuts will be the three oldest maps in the current pool and Central Protocol.
For map adds, we pushed the direction that we discussed last week, and we'd like to thank everyone for providing feedback to our map design team so that they'll have a strong direction for Season 2.
- We're planning to replace Central Protocol with a map with a similar idea and better execution: (4)Invader.
- The second map will allow players to break down Rock Towers in order to block off all possible ground paths to your base and three additional expansions. We want to see if we can get some island-like scenarios without the problems of island maps.
- The third map will feature a small ramp leading down from the base to a long, thin ground path as the main, central avenue of attack. Players can use buildings and/or units to more easily defend this choke point. Moving defensive locations away from the base and making use of the terrain have the potential to create cool games.
- The fourth map is (8)KorhalCarnageKnockout. There are many places, depending on the flow of expansions, where players will really need to strategize around when to break Rocks and Rock Towers both on the offense and defense.
We would also like to acknowledge the mapmaker, Sidian. When we look at his maps, even the ones that aren't used on the ladder, we really admire his work. We know how difficult it is to be creative while still thinking about game balance when making maps, and Sidian is a solid example of someone who clearly tries his best on both fronts.
We know it's not as difficult to just pump out the same types of maps on different tilesets, but it's just awesome seeing many mapmakers out there pushing the limits for the better of the game.
Map Diversity and Map Balance
First, we would like to thank the casters in SSL and Proleague for pointing out how new maps in Legacy of the Void, such as Ulrena, are creating much more interesting games and scenarios than maps of the same type. We completely agree, and believe map diversity makes the playing and spectating experiences better.
With that said, because we are pushing map diversity much harder in Legacy of the Void, the chances of there being balance issues on specific maps may be higher. Unlike balance changes to the game, we can definitely have a much quicker turnaround on map balance changes.
Map Data
Please keep in mind that although data contributes towards the big picture, it doesn't say everything about the situation and is not the absolute source from which we draw conclusions. That's why we approach gauging the state of the game by looking into many factors such as ladder data, community feedback, pro feedback, current meta game on the ladder/tournaments, tournament results, checking past experiences, and so on.
With that said, since the map changes to the current pool last time, we're seeing that every map in every matchup at all skill levels using our adjusted ratings is off by plus or minus 5%. Adjusted ratings are win/loss percentages that are measured with the players' skill factored out on the ladder, so that we can more accurately gauge the state of each race. The general gauge suggested by our stats/math people for adjusted ratings is that plus or minus 5% is just normal data fluctuating, and over plus or minus 10% means there could be an issue.
To reiterate, we're not saying the balance is perfect—we just want to point this out due to how we're seeing clear improvements on the data side since the last changes. So congrats on the great suggestions!
Let's continue to focus on other points other than data to really zero in on potential balance issues and discuss solutions to the issues so that we can make the best changes we can on a map by map basis. Data alone can't paint the best clear big picture, and we have to spend efforts across all fronts to make the least biased decision.
Balance
Please share your thoughts on the topics we're discussing this week :
Ravager
Cooldown nerf looks to be the strongest in this area. For example, if we go from 10 seconds to 14 seconds on the ability, that's a big DPS nerf on the ability damage.
We definitely want to nerf either Ravager timings or Overlord drops in PvZ, due to strategy diversity on the Protoss side. But we don't need a simultaneous double nerf.
Overlord Tier 1 Drops
We saw the strong points many of you brought up in terms of not nerfing Ravagers, and focusing more so on Overlord drops as the first pass.
If we were to go this route, we believe moving the requirement from Evolution Chamber to Lair would be the most reasonable, and although this is a huge nerf, we can definitely test this out due to the early game PvZ issue looking pretty clear at this point.
Let's discuss whether we should test a Ravager or Overlord tier 1 drop nerf first, because we'd like to test something as soon as possible on the balance test map so that we can patch to the live game.
Cyclone
We believe the suggestion of increasing health but also increasing the supply cost is good to make sure that we buff them for the early/mid game, while making it about the same in the late game.
We also believe due to the cost of this unit, this could potentially be a safe change that doesn't give outright advantage to Terran as a whole.
Because Terran is at a powerful state right now, we definitely don't want to only do straight-up buffs.
Banshee
After going over the feedback and having more discussions around it, we wonder if we can take away the strength of Liberators somewhat, and make the Banshee movement speed upgrade lower in tier, such as no requirement or Armory requirement.
This is the same logic as the above; we can't just straight-up buff Terran when they are already performing strongly at the moment.
If we were to nerf the range and upgraded range of Liberators against ground, we can maybe bring the Banshee speed upgrade requirement down much lower, so that there can be a bit of decision making and choice with these two units depending on the situation.
AA from the Factory
We are currently exploring your feedback of potentially bringing in a generally solid AA option on the Factory to allow for a reliable ground based AA solution.
We can definitely explore this angle with the Cyclone (if we don't go the route proposed above), but Thor is definitely another area we can go.
For example, because splash AA is covered pretty well by Widow Mines, one potential route we can go is more of a single-target, flat damage option on the Thor.
Let's discuss so that we can start exploring this front soon.
Discussions Around Mech
Thanks for many great discussions around this topic. After going through the feedback, our current thought is to focus more on individual mech units first, and diversifying that. As we explore changes in this area, we'll be able to identify what type of strategies and unit compositions show potential, so we can go from there. The question as to whether bio and mech should be completely split or always mixed will naturally be answered better as we explore individual design improvements.
Next Week
We won't have an update next week, because some of our team members will be at GDC. However, we will still be exploring the exact changes that we need to test for the next balance test map. So please continue contributing to the proposed changes to the next balance test map so that we can continue making StarCraft II the best game it can be.
